Marines, The Few, the Proud graphic that links to the Official Marine Corps website.

 

 

Marine Corps Base Hawaii - Supporting Readiness and Global Projection.

Business Performance Office.
A-76/Strategic Sourcing Information

 

Contact us for cost savings ideas and A-76 questions.  257-3188/1953

About Strategic Sourcing

The A-76 Process

Commercial Activities Competition

What is Competitive Sourcing?

GAO A-76 Report

A-76 Websites

Voluntary Separation Incentives

DoD Priority Placement Program

Reduction in Force (RIF)

 

Strategic Sourcing

Strategic Sourcing is a strategic plan that calls for both our installations and operating forces to seek cost reductions and operating efficiencies. The Marine Corps is committed to maximizing the efficiencies achieved through competitive sourcing and privatization. We will utilize a wide range of measures to achieve these cost reductions and efficiencies, to include OMB Circular A-76 competitions, regionalization of functions, and better contracting and accounting policies and procedures.

The savings we accrue from Strategic Sourcing will be used to fund modernization, sustain our installations, equip our forces, compensate mandated budget reductions and assist our personnel who may be adversely affected. This initiative will affect every base, station and Marine unit throughout the entire Marine Corps. This will streamline the way we conduct operations and business throughout the Marine Corps.

The Department of Defense has directed that all services review their business procedures relative to commercial, contractual activities. As a result, all Marine Corps commands and activities are involved in a wide range of Strategic Sourcing initiatives. A study is currently underway to determine what functions, if any, might best be performed by outside contractors. An Installation Strategic Sourcing Initiative Team is now in place to conduct reviews for establishing better business practices. This team will examine opportunities for reorganization, privatization, regionalization, process reengineering and competitive sourcing.

 

The A-76 Process

The A-76 process, taken from Office of Management and Budget Circular Number A-76 is OSD's primary vehicle for identifying savings through competition. A-76 is a complex but valid and commonly accepted process for all U.S. government activities to compete functions that do not have to be performed exclusively by government officials. The key to A-76 is competition: in very simplified terms, the existing government workforce works to achieve its ''most efficient organization'', then competes to perform functions against private industry.

Most Efficient Organization (MEO) is a term used under OMB A-76. It is an organizational plan, including numbers and types of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs), that is developed as the most economical and effective means of carrying out work specified in a performance work statement. The MEO is the basis for the in-house cost estimate, which competes under A-76 with the private-sector bid.

Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) are equal to one work-year for a given job. We compete based on FTEs instead of positions in order to standardize the amount of work we expect to be accomplished by the given job and to account for work that is regularly done part-time or with overtime.

The Commercial Activities (CA) Program implements a change that the Government will rely on the private sector for goods and services when it is proper and economical to do so. The objective of the CA Program is to improve management and productivity through fair competition by determining whether Government generated goods and services are produced as efficiently and cost effectively as similar or identical goods and services in the private sector. The program works to establish cost-effective methods of obtaining goods and services, whether by streamlining in-house performance or contracting out the function to the private sector.

Strategic Sourcing and the A-76 process are complicated and require extensive studies, thorough research and detailed preparation through the collective efforts of managers, contracted advisors and commanders throughout the Marine Corps. As executors of base commercial activities, Installation Commanders are best suited to determine what base support functions should be competed. The U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Atlantic and Pacific commands will coordinate the development of plans to consolidate delivery of services on a regional basis. Headquarters Marine Corps program sponsors will facilitate this process. As stewards for the entire Marine Corps, Headquarters Marine Corps is best situated to nominate functions for regional or Marine Corps-wide competition.

The actual A-76 process cannot begin until a formal announcement of "functions for potential review" is given to Congress. Marine Corps Order 4860.3D directs installation commanders to notify affected employees and their representative unions upon receipt of the message from CMC authorizing commencement of a commercial activities study under A-76. As information has become available to base/station commanders and supervisors on the future implementation of the A-76 process or any other BMI, communications plans have been developed to inform the base/station employees of the potential consequences. All military and civilian employees will be kept well informed as we evaluate our internal business practices and identify ways to streamline, reorganize, outsource and privatize functions. More importantly, they will be intimately involved with the honest evaluation of our business practices.

Implementing Strategic Sourcing was mandated by the 1997 Defense Reform Initiative Directives. The increasing costs of aging equipment and facilities, forces the Marine Corps to identify support functions that could be performed by the private sector for a better price, without sacrificing quality, and reinvesting those savings into procurement and manning.

The current Marine Corps goals are 18-24 months to complete a multi-function CA study. This competition is conducted through use of a contract solicitation. The first step is the preparation of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The PWS is the heart of the contract solicitation and will define the tasks that must be accomplished. Based on the requirements in the PWS, the Government will conduct a Management Study to design and develop its MEO to perform the work in the PWS, and, based on MEO structure, the Government then computes its bid. Once the solicitation is issued, prospective contractors will submit their proposals, describing how they will perform the PWS work and how much they will charge to do so. A Technical Evaluation Board (TEB) will evaluate contractor proposals. The evaluation process will determine which contractor best meets the established evaluation factors and that contractor's bid will be compared with the Government's bid. If the contractor's bid does not beat the Government's bid by at least 10% of the in-house personnel related cost or $10 million (whichever is lower) over the period of the performance, the function will be performed by the Government.

By carefully analyzing the lessons learned from previous business practices, and having the ability to accurately track and compare costs, we will be better prepared to make the complex and difficult decisions required in the competitive sourcing process.

 

Commercial Activities Competition

It is conceivable that all active duty Marines and our civilian employees could be impacted by the effort to support the Marine Corp's force modernization requirements. Our civilian employees are dedicated, skilled, and hardworking. We will do for our civilian employees what we do for our Marines and provide them with the training and tools to make them more efficient and better able to compete with the private sector. A-76 ensures that competitions between public and private sectors occur on a level playing field. The Marine Corps will keep all in-house bids close hold to ensure that we do not place our civilians at a disadvantage in the bidding process.

If the Government wins, action will be taken to implement the MEO as it is described in the management study. If the MEO contains less than the current number of positions performing the function, or the grade structure is different, management will rely on the full range of available personnel actions (e.g. attrition, voluntary early retirement authority/voluntary separation incentive pay (VERA/VSIP), reduction-in-force (RIF), reassignments, etc.) to meet the MEO's staffing requirement.

If the Contractor wins, the contractor will perform the function with its work force displacing all affected Government employees. However, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.207-3 (Right of First Refusal of Employment) states "The contractor shall give Government employees who have been or will be adversely affected or separated as a result of award of this contract the right of first refusal for employment openings under the contract in positions for which they are qualified." This FAR clause will be included in the contract solicitation. While it does not require the contractor to hire any government employee it does prohibit the contractor from hiring anyone else without first offering vacant positions to qualified displaced government employees. This applies only to job openings for which displaced employees are qualified. The right of first refusal does not apply when employees would otherwise be prohibited from such employment by the government's post-employment conflict of interest rules. Historically, qualified displaced Government employees are hired by the incoming contractor. Prior to actually instituting a change, those involved will be briefed on what and how things are going to change and how the change will benefit the base.

Any reduction in civilian force will be handled in accordance with existing regulations and negotiated agreements. The Commandant's intent is to use attrition, retraining, and reassignment to the maximum extent possible. We fully expect - and experience has shown - that the government sector will win a significant portion of these competitions. But when it does, it will be because it provides the best service at the best price.

Negotiated labor agreements associated with individual commercial activities may vary. However, the following benefits may be available to adversely affected employees: severance pay; registration in the DoD Priority Placement Program, registration in the Defense Outplacement Referral System; placement on the DoD Reemployment Priority List; Incentive Payment; and Voluntary Early Retirement Authority. Employees should contact their HRO representative for more information on what specific benefits may apply to them.  

 

Back to the A76 Page

Back to the BPO Home Page

 

 

About

Privacy Policy

MCBH Webmaster

ICE

Site Map

 

Last Updated: 20 April  2011

MCBH Webmaster

Top